The present invention relates to a method for the detection of pathogenic
1. A method for the detection of pathogenic primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat labile toxin, or heat stabile toxin for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enterotoxigenic primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteroaggregative primers that hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteroaggregative primers that hybridise to the inv-plasmid for the amplification of a DNA sequence contained in enteroinvasive primers that hybridise to the EAF plasmid, or the eae gene for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteropathogenic primers that hybridise to the genes encoding shiga-like toxin sltI or sltII for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enterohemorrhagic 2. The method according to the set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding heat labile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic the set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic the set of primers that hybridise for the gene encoding heat stabile toxin characteristic for enteroaggregative the set of primers which hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the inv-plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the EAF plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the eae gene is the primers which hybridises to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin SltI is the primers which hybridises to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin SltII is wherein W is A/T, R is A/G, D is A/G/T, Y is C/T and K is G/T. 3. The method according to 4. The method according to the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat labile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic 5′ AGC TCC CCA CTC TAT TAC AGA ACT ATG3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat stabile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic 5′ ACA TAC GTT ACA GAC ATA ATC AGA ATC AG3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat stabile toxin characteristic for enteroaggregative 5′ ATG AAG GGG CGA AGT TCT GGC TCA ATG TGC3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of pCVD432 plasmid is 5′ CTC TTT TAA CTT ATG ATA TGT AAT GTC TGG3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the inv-plasmid is; 5′ CAA AAA CAG AAG AAC CTA TGT CTA CCT3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the EAF-plasmid is; 5′° CTT GGA GTG ATC GAA CGG GAT CCA AAT3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the eae gene is 5′ TAA ACG GGT ATT ATC AAC AGA AAA ATC C3′; the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of shiga-like toxin SltI gene is 5′ TCG CTG AAT CCC CCT CCA TTA TGA CAG GCA3′; and the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of shiga-like toxin SltII gene is 5′ CAG GTA CTG CAT TTG ATT GTG ACA GTC ATT3′. 5. The method according to 6. The method according to 7. A set of primers useful for PCR amplification of DNA specific for virulence factors/toxins of pathogenic a set of primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat labile toxin, or heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic a set of primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative a set of primers that hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid of enteroaggregative a set of primers that hybridise to the inv-plasmid of enteroinvasive a set of primers that hybridise to the EAF plasmid, or the eae gene of enteropathogenic a set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin sltl or sltII of enterohemorrhagic 8. The set of primers according to the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat labile toxin of enterotoxigenic the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative the set of primers which hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the inv-plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the EAF plasmid is the set of primers which hybridise to the eae gene is the set of primers which hybridise to the shiga-like toxin sltI gene is and the set of primers which hybridise to the shiga-like toxin sltII is wherein W is A/T, R is A/G, D is A/G/T, Y is C/T and K is G/T. 9. The set of primers according to 5′ AGC TCC CCA GTC TAT TAC AGA ACT ATG3′ which hybridises to a gene encoding heat labile toxin of enterotoxigenic 5′ ACA TAC GTT ACA GAC ATA ATC AGA ATC AG3′ which hybridises to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic 5′ ATG AAG GGG CGA AGT TCT GGC TCA ATG TGC3′ which hybridises to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative 5′ CTC TTT TAA CTT ATG ATA TGT AAT GTC TGG3′ which hybridises to the pCVD432 plasmid; 5′ CAA AAA CAG AAG AAC CTA TGT CTA CCT3′ which hybridises to the inv-plasmid; 5′ CTT GGA GTG ATC GAA CGG GAT CCA AAT3′ which hybridises to the EAF plasmid; 5′ TAA ACG GGT ATT ATC AAC AGA AAA ATCC3′ which hybridises to the eae gene; 5′ TCG CTG AAT CCC CCT CCA TTA TGA CAG GCA3′ which hybridises to the shiga-like toxin SltI gene; and 5′ CAG GTA CTG GAT TTG ATT GTG ACA GTC ATT3′ which hybridises to the shiga-like toxin SltII gene. 10. The use of the method according to LT-1: 5′ GCG TTA CTA TCC TCT CTA TGT G 3′ and LT-2: 5′ AGT TTT CCA TAC TGA TTG CCG C 3′; ST-1: 5′ TCC CTC AGG ATG CTA AAC CAG 3′ and ST-2a: 5′ TCG ATT TAT TCA ACA AAG CAA C 3′; EASTI-1: 5′ AAC TGC TGG GTA TGT GGC TGG 3′ and EASTI-2: 5′ TGC TGA CCT GCC TCT TCC ATG 3′; EA-1: 5′ CTG GCG AAA GAC TGT ATC ATT G 3′ and EA-2: 5′ TAA TGT ATA GAA ATC CGC TGT T 3′; EI-1: 5′ TTT CTG GAT GGT ATG GTG AGG 3′ and EI-2: 5′ CTT GAA CAT AAG GAA ATA AAC 3′; EP-1: 5′ CAG GGT AAA AGA AAG ATG ATA AG 3′ and EP-2: 5′ AAT ATG GGG ACC ATG TAT TAT C 3′; EPeh-1: 5′ CCC GGA CCC GGC ACA AGC ATA AG 3′ and EPeh-2: 5′ AGT CTC GCC AGT ATT CGC CAC C 3′; SltI-1: 5′ ATG AAA AAA ACA TTA TTA ATA GC 3′ and SltI-2: 5′ TCA CYG AGC TAT TCT GAG TCA AGC 3′; and SltII-1: 5′ ATG AAG AAG ATR WTT RTD GCR GYT TTA TTY G 3′ and SltII-2: 5′ TCA GTC ATW ATT AAA CTK CAC YTS RGC AAA KCC 3′ LT-1: 5′ GCG TTA CTA TCC TCT CTA TGT G 3 and LT-2: 5′ AGT TTT CCA TAC TGA TTG CCG C 3′; ST-1: 5′ TCC CTC AGG ATG CTA AAC CAG 3′ and ST-2a: 5′ TCG ATT TAT TCA ACA AAG CAA C 3′; EASTI-1: 5′ AAC TGC TGG GTA TGT GGC TGG 3′ and EASTI-2: 5′ TGC TGA CCT GCC TCT TCC ATG 3′; EA-1: 5′ CTG GCG AAA GAC TGT ATC ATT G 3′ and EA-2: 5′ TAA TGT ATA GAA ATC CGC TGT T 3′; EI-1: 5′ TTT CTG GAT GGT ATG GTG AGG 3′ and EI-2: 5′ CTT GAA CAT AAG GAA ATA AAC 3′; EP-1: 5′ CAG GGT AAA AGA AAG ATG ATA AG 3′ and EP-2: 5′ AAT ATG GGG ACC ATG TAT TAT 3′; EPeh-1: 5′ CCC GGA CCC GGC ACA AGC ATA AG 3′ and EPeh-2: 5′ AGT CTC GCC AGT ATT CGC CAC C 3′; SltI-1: 5′ ATG AAA AAA ACA TTA TTA ATA GC 3′ and SltI-2: 5′ TCA CYG AGC TAT TCT GAG TCA AGC 3′; SltII-1: 5′ ATG AAG AAG ATR WTT RTD GCR GYT TTA TTY G 3′ and SltII-2: 5′ TCA GTC ATW ATT AAA CTK CAC YTS RGC AAA KCC 3′
[0001] The present invention relates to a rapid, high performance assay for the detection of pathogenic [0002] Enterohemorrhagic, shiga-like toxin (sit) producing [0003] In most outbreaks reported, consumption of contaminated ground beef has been the source of infection (5,8,19-22), whereas in Japan raddish sprouts are suspected (10). EHEC has been isolated from cow milk (6,19,23), Water (19), chicken, pork, and apple cider (19,24,25), but also human horizontal smear infections have been reported (15). Cattle appear likely to be the reservoir (22,26). Cross contamination, improper handling, and inadequate cooking all contribute to food-borne infections caused by EHEC. EHEC produce Shiga-like toxins (sit), also known as verotoxins or cytotoxins (12,27). A large proportion of EHEC have been found to belong to the serogroup O157:H7, but notably, also a variety of EHEC belonging to other serogroups (O22, O26, O55, O111, O114, O145) have been reported especially in Europe (12,15,28-32). [0004] Besides EHEC, certain other strains of [0005] EPEC cause diarrheal symptoms primarily in infants (32). Although the pathogenesis is unclear, the epithelial degradation of the gut, and the inflammatory response that are observed in tissue sections may be a consequence due to the adhesive properties of the bacterium. Specific attachment factors of EPEC are plasmid encoded (EAF=EPEC adherence factor) (37,44). EHEC often contain an adherence factor closely related to EAF that is known as eae (EHEC attaching and effacing gene) (45,46). EPEC most often belong to serogroups O6, O8, O25, O111, O119, and O142 (32). [0006] EIEC strains are capable of penetrating and invading the intestinal epithelial cells and produce an inflammatory diarrhea similar to that caused by Shigella bacteria (38,47,48). Fecal smears contain blood, mucus and segmented neutrophils. EIEC contain virulence plasmids coding for additional pathogenic factors (48). Serogroups O28, O112, O115, O124, O136, O143, O145, and O147 are most commonly found on EIEC (32). [0007] EaggEC are associated with persistent diarrhea in children and with traveller's diarrhea. EaggEC are characterized by their adherence capacity that leads to aggregation of Hep-2 cells. This effect is associated with the presence of a virulence plasmid (pCVD432). EaggEC are supected to also produce a heat stable enterotoxin (EAST1) (49-53). They can belong to serogroups O44 and O126 (32). [0008] Conventional detection methods for EHEC encompass enrichment and isolation with selective and/or indicator media such as [0009] DNA hybridization techniques have been established for experimental research but are not applicable for large scale routine diagnostic procedures (66,67). DNA amplification based assays, using PCR have been reported (68-72). Limitations to these methods include cumbersome post-PCR detection methods (agarose gel electrophoresis, Biotin/Avidin based ELISA detection systems). [0010] To overcome these problems, a PCR assay which allows the specific determination of virulence factors characteristic for EHEC, ETEC, EPEC, EIEC, and EaggEC that is based on a fluorigenic detection method of PCR amplification has been developed. [0011] This assay exploits the 5′→3′exonuclease activity of Taq-DNA polymerase (73) to cleave an internal oligonucleotide probe that is covalently conjugated- with a fluorescent reporter dye (e.g. 6-carboxy-fluorescein [FAM]; λem=518 nm) and a fluorescent quencher dye (6-carboxytetramethyl-rhodamine [TAMRA]; λem=582 nm) at the 5′ and 3′end, respectively (74,75). Fluorescence from FAM is efficiently quenched by TAMRA on the same, intact probe molecule (76). In the case that cognate PCR amplification occurs, Taq polymerase extends from the specific PCR primer and cleaves the internal, fluorigenic oligonucleotide probe annealed to the template strand. Thus, the reporter dye and the quencher dye get spatially separated. As a consequence of oligonucleotide hydrolysis and physical separation of the reporter and the quencher dyes, a measurable increase in fluoresecence intensity at 518 nm can be observed. PCR cycling leads to exponential amplification of the PCR product and consequently of fluorescence intensity. [0012] TaqMan™-PCR is performed in optical tubes that allow measurements of fluorescence signals without opening the PCR tubes. This dramatically minimizes post-PCR processing time and almost completely eliminates cross-PCR contamination problems. Employing this approach, simultaneous testing of biological materials for the presence of virulence genes of [0013] According to the present invention TaqMan™-PCR for the detection of pathogenic [0014] It is an object of the present invention to provide a rapid, high performance assay for the detection and identification of pathogenic [0015] It is a further object of the present invention to provide specific, optimised primers and labelled oligonucleotide probes useful for the amplification of sequences encoding virulence factors/toxins characteristic for pathogenic [0016] The invention then, inter alia, comprises the following alone or in combination: [0017] A method for the detection of pathogenic [0018] primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat labile toxin, or heat stabile toxin for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enterotoxigenic [0019] primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteroaggregative [0020] primers that hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteroaggregative [0021] primers that hybridise to the inv-plasmid for the amplification of a DNA sequence contained in enteroinvasive [0022] primers that hybridise to the EAF plasmid, or the eae gene for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enteropathogenic [0023] primers that hybridise to the genes encoding shiga-like toxin sltI or sltII for the amplification of a DNA sequence characteristic for enterohemorrhagic [0024] the method as above wherein [0025] the set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding heat labile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic [0026] the set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic [0027] the set of primers that hybridise for the gene encoding heat stabile toxin characteristic for enteroaggregative [0028] the set of primers which hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid is
[0029] the set of primers which hybridise to the inv-plasmid is
[0030] the set of primers which hybridise to the EAF plasmid is
[0031] the set of primers which hybridise to the eae gene is
[0032] the primers which hybridises to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin SltI is
[0033] the primers which hybridises to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin SltII is
[0034] wherein W is A/T, R is A/G, D is A/G/T, Y is C/T and K is G/T; [0035] the method as above wherein a polymerase having additional 5′-3′ exonuclease activity is used for the amplification of DNA, and an oligonucleotide probe labelled at the most 5′ base with a fluorescent dye and at the most 3′ base with a fluorescent quencher dye which hybridises within the target DNA is included in the amplification process; said labelled oligonucleotide probe being susceptible to 5′-3′ exonuclease degradation by said polymerase to produce fragments that can be detected by fluorogenic detection methods; [0036] the method as above wherein [0037] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat labile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic 5′ AGC TCC CCA GTC TAT TAC AGA ACT ATG3′; [0038] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat stabile toxin characteristic for enterotoxigenic 5′ ACA TAC GTT ACA GAC ATA ATC AGA ATC AG3′; [0039] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of heat stabile toxin characteristic for enteroaggregative 5′ ATG AAG GGG CGA AGT TCT GGC TCA ATG TGC3′; [0040] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of pCVD432 plasmid is 5′ CTC TTT TAA CTT ATG ATA TGT AAT GTC TGG3′; [0041] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the inv-plasmid is; 5′ CAA AAA CAG AAG AAC CTA TGT CTA CCT3′ [0042] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the EAF-plasmid is; 5′ CTT GGA GTG ATC GAA CGG GAT CCA AAT3′; [0043] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of the eae gene is 5′0 TAA ACG GGT ATT ATC AAC AGA AAA ATC C3′; [0044] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of shiga-like toxin SltI gene is 5′ TCG CTG AAT CCC CCT CCA TTA TGA CAG GCA3′; and [0045] the labelled oligonucleotide probe for the detection of shiga-like toxin SltII gene is 5′ CAG GTA CTG GAT TTG ATT GTG ACA GTC ATT3′; [0046] the method as above wherein the fluoroscent reporter dye is 6-carboxy- fluoroscein, tetrachloro-6-carboxy-fluoroscein, or hexachloro-6-carboxy- fluoroscein, and the fluorescent quencher dye is 6-carboxytetramethyl- rhodamine; [0047] the method as above wherein the PCR amplification process consists of 35 PCR cycles at a MgCl2 concentration of 5.2 mmol, an annealing temperature of 55° C. and an extension temperature of 65° C.; [0048] a set of primers useful for PCR amplification of DNA specific for virulence factors/toxins of pathogenic [0049] a set of primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat labile toxin, or heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic [0050] a set of primers that hybridise to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative [0051] a set of primers that hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid of enteroaggregative [0052] a set of primers that hybridise to the inv-plasmid of enteroinvasive [0053] a set of primers that hybridise to the EAF plasmid, or the eae gene of enteropathogenic [0054] a set of primers that hybridise to the gene encoding shiga-like toxin sltI or sltI of enterohemorrhagic [0055] the set of primers as above wherein [0056] the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat labile toxin of enterotoxigenic [0057] the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic [0058] the set of primers which hybridise to the gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative [0059] the set of primers which hybridise to the pCVD432 plasmid is
[0060] the set of primers which hybridise to the inv-plasmid is
[0061] the set of primers which hybridise to the EAF plasmid is
[0062] the set of primers which hybridise to the eae gene is
[0063] the set of primers which hybridise to the shiga-like toxin sltI gene is
[0064] and [0065] the set of primers which hybridise to the shiga-like toxin sltII is
[0066] wherein W is A/T, R is A/G, D is A/G/T, Y is C/T and K is G/T; the set of primers as above which in addition to the primers for amplification of target DNA comprise a labelled oligonucleotide probe which is labelled with a fluoroscent reporter dye, such as 6-carboxy-fluoroscein, tetrachloro-6-carboxy-fluoroscein, hexachloro-6-carboxy-fluoroscein, at the most 5′ base and a fluoroscent quencher dye, such as 6-carboxytetramethyl-rhodamine, at the most 3′ base, and have a nucleotide sequence selected from 5′ AGC TCC CCA GTC TAT TAC AGA ACT ATG3′ [0067] which hybridises to a gene encoding heat labile toxin of enterotoxigenic 5′ ACA TAC GTT ACA GAC ATA ATC AGA ATC AG3′ [0068] which hybridises to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enterotoxigenic 5′ ATG AAG GGG CGA AGT TCT GGC TCA ATG TGC3′ [0069] which hybridises to a gene encoding heat stabile toxin of enteroaggregative 5′ CTC TTT TAA CTT ATG ATA TGT AAT GTC TGG3′ [0070] which hybridises to the pCVD432 plasmid; 5′CAA AAA CAG AAG AAC CTA TGT CTA CCT3′ [0071] which hybridises to the inv-plasmid; 5′ CTT GGA GTG ATC GAA CGG GAT CCA AAT3′ [0072] which hybridises to the EAF plasmid; 5′ TAA ACG GGT ATT ATC AAC AGA AAA ATC C3′ [0073] which hybridises to the eae gene; 5′ TCG CTG AAT CCC CCT CCA TTA TGA CAG GCA3′ [0074] which hybridises to the shiga-like toxin SltI gene; and 5′ CAG GTA CTG GAT TTG ATT GTG ACA CTC ATT3′ [0075] which hybridises to the shiga-like toxin SltII gene; the use of the method as above for diagnosing an [0076] Conventional methods used to detect PCR amplification are laboursome, employ potentially carcinogenic substances (ethidium bromide gel electrophoresis), and are not suited as a routine assay method in the microbiological routine laboratory (68-72). This poses a serious problem, especially when potential pathogenic bacteria cannot be differentiated from facultative pathogenic or apathogenic ones due to characteristic biochemical, serological and/ or morphological criteria. Thus, specific nucleic acid-based diagnostic methods that directly detect virulence factors or toxins harbored by these species are mandatory. This is in principal the case for the diagnosis of pathogenic [0077] The TaqMan™-System relies on standard PCR technique with the addition of a specific internal fluorogenic oligonucleotide probe. The combination of conventional PCR with the Taq polymerase-dependent degradation of an internally hybridized oligonucleotide probe confers also specificity to this detection method, since it is highly unlikely that unspecific PCR amplification will yield positive fluorescence signals. Some rules for chosing the fluorigenic probes have to be obeyed (74,75). Criticial are the length of the probe, the location of reporter and quencher dyes and the absence of a guanosine at the 5′-end (74). Also, the distance of the probe from one of the specific PCR primers is important. This is due to the fact that the probe has to stay annealed to the template strand in order to be cleaved by Taq polymerase. Since annealing depends, at least partially, on the Tm of the probe, probes should be designed to have a higher Tm as the primers. According to the present invention this was solved (except for sltII) by designing probes that were 3 to 6 bp longer than the specific primers. PCR amplification includes extension of the target sequence after annealing of the primers and the Tm of the extended primers increases. For the fluorogenic oligonucleotide probe, where the 3′-end is capped in order to avoid elongation, the Tm remains constant, making it more likely that the probe dissociates before degradation by Taq polymerase. Oligonucleotide probe degradation can be optimized by spatial proximity of the fluorogenic probe and the primer. By moving the probe for sItI from 121 bp to 9 bp close to the primer, a significant improvement in ΔRQ values could be obtained. A second strategy of optimization of TaqMan-™-PCR is to perform PCR elongation at 65° C., where it is also less likely that the probe dissociates from the template strand before Taq polymerase reaches and hydrolizes it. Values for ΔRQ can thus again be increased about 1.2 to 1.5 fold. The increase of ΔRQ values might be due to the ratio of annealed oligonucleotide probe reached by Taq polymerase or to an increased processivity of Taq polymerase. [0078] The concentration of fluorogenic probes influences the accuracy of TaqMan™-results. When the probe concentrations were >50 pmol/PCR reaction only a relatively small fraction was hydrolysed by Taq polymerase. The ratio of undegraded probe to degraded probe remains high and the fluorescence emmission of the unquenched reporter dye does not significantly increase in relation to the fluorescence intensity of the reporter dye still close to the quencher. Thus, at high probe concentrations, ΔRQ values are lower than with intermediate probe concentrations (10-20 pmol). When the probe concentration is too low, ΔRQ values are increased, however, variability of PCR results is increased, since probably small errors in pipeting or minimal differences between PCR reactions become critical. Optimal probe concentration that yielded smallest variabilties and highest RQ values were found at a probe concentration of 20 pmol. [0079] Since TaqMan™-PCR uses an internal oligonucleotide probe for detection of template amplification, specific primers and probes can be amply designed. The design of primer and probe sequences is especially important, when nucleotide sequence variants of a given gene exist. This is the case for sltI and sltII. For sltI, all published sequences were aligned and primers and probes were designed to bind to conserved regions of all three variants. For sltII, only one region of the published genes was conserved, thus this region was chosen for the fluorogenic oligonucleotide probe. The primers for amplification of sltII were designed to contain all possible nucleotide sequences at the ambiguous positions of the published sltII variants (degenerate primer approach) (79-83). By employing degenerate primers, it is possible to detect all published variants in one single PCR reaction. [0080] The isolation method for template DNA affects the performance of the PCR. Two methods, that are suited as rapid purification steps for routine applications, namely boiling prep or spin prep were compared. Boiling preps may still contain some bacterial components that can affect PCR reactions, however, it is extremely fast. The spin prep method involves isolation steps that serve to purify DNA from potentially negatively influencing materials. ΔRQ values and sensitivity of TaqMan™-PCR for virulence genes from enterobacteria was not found significantly increased as compared to boiling preps when template DNA was prepared by spin prep method. [0081] The overall sensitivity of TaqMan-PCR for all primer/probe combinations was comparable to visual scoring of PCR products by detection with ethidium bromide stained agarose gel electrophoresis. Under optimized conditions, as few as 103 cfu sitI+ EHEC could be detected among 107 non-pathogenic [0082] The use of immunomagnetic detection methods for [0083] The infectious agents of a large proportion of diarrheal diseases is not known. Routine screening for bacterial pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract encompasses Salmonella sp., Shigella sp, [0084] The TaqMan™-assay according to the invention for detection of pathogenic [0085] Interestingly, the two children diagnosed with EHEC were severely sick, one suffered from hemorrhagic colitis, the other developed HUS and had to be treated in a critical care unit. [0086] Collectively, these investigations show that a large proportion of diarrheal diseases in children and also in adults are associated with pathogenic [0087] According to the present invention [0088] Primer sequences and their locations with GenBank accessions are detailed in Table 2. Detection of EHEC sltl is based on consensus primer and probe sequences after alignment of sltI homologous genes (Genbank accessions Z36899, Z36900, and Z36901) (77,78). Detection of sltII variants is based on published sequences of homologous genes (Genbank accessions M76738, Z37725, L11079, X67515, M59432, M29153, M36727, and M21534) (79-83). For amplification of sltII, degenerate primer sets proved optimal. Diagnosis of ETEC is based on amplification of either heat labile (LT) (84) or heat stable toxin (ST) (36), EaggEC on pCVD432 plasmid sequences (40,50), EIEC -on inv-plasmid sequences (38,48), EPEC on [0089] Oligonucleotide probes and their Genbank Ref. are shown in table 3. Oligonucleotide probes were designed (if possible) with a GC-content of 40-60%, no G-nucleotide at the 5′-end, length of probes was 27 to 30 bp. Probes were covalently conjugated with a fluorescent reporter dye (e.g. 6-carboxy-fluorescein [FAM]; λem=518 nm) and a fluorescent quencher dye (6-carboxytetram-ethyl-rhodamine [TAMRA]; λem=582 nm) at the most 5′ and most 3′ base, respectively. All primers and probes were obtained from Perkin Elmer, Germany. [0090] TaqMan™-PCR was optimized by isolation of DNA from [0091] The [0092] The influence of DNA preparation on the performance of TaqMan™-PCR was tested, since it has been reported that crude bacterial lysates can contain inhibiting factors that might interfere with PCR performance. Therefore, bacteria were collected after overnight growth on McConkey plates. DNA was prepared by boiling of bacteria inoculated in 0.9% NaCl solution or by isolation of genomic DNA with a commercial spin prep procedure (see the example, material and methods). The RQ values and sensititvity of TaqMan™-PCR did not differ when the two preparation methods were compared. The RQ values obtained for PCR amplifications from DNA derived from 105 sltI or sltII containing EHEC prepared by boiling or by spin prep comparable. [0093] The TaqMan™-PCR method relies on the detection of free reporter dye (FAM) that is released from the probe after hydrolysis. Thus, probe concentration should also have an effect on the assay performance by affecting the fraction of the probe that is degraded during PCR cycling. Probe concentrations were titrated in the range of 100 pmol to 0.1 pmol and ΔRQ values were determined. Optimal probe concentrations varied in between 10 pmol and 20 pmol depending on the target gene that was amplified. [0094] For testing sensitivity of TaqMan-PCR, EHEC containing either sltl or sltII were diluted in a suspension containing [0095] The following example will illustrate the invention further. It is, however, not to be construed as limiting. [0096] In order to verify TaqMan™-PCR performance and to test for the occurence of pathogenic [0097] Collection of specimen took place fom June to October 1996. All samples in this study were derived from the area of Southern Bavaria. Stool specimen were plated on McConkey agar, incubated overnight and enterobacteria were collected. DNA was isolated and used as template in PCR reactions containing specific primers and fluorigenic probes for sltI, sltII, LT, ST, EAF-plasmid, eae-gene, inv-plasmid, and pCVD432. For verification of the integrity of DNA from individual preparations a control PCR reaction was set up, containing primers and an internal fluorigenic probe for amplification of the parC gene of [0098] Enterobacteria from the two patients with EHEC were hybridized with sltI and sltII gene probes for testing accuracy and specificity of TaqMan™-PCR. In the case of patient one, where TaqMan™-PCR was positive for sltI, only colonies hybridizing with sltI could be found. Colonies of patient two, where TaqMan™-PCR was positive for sltI and sltII, hybridized with probes for sltI and sltII. Positive colonies were picked and biochemically typed as [0099] Antibiotic susceptibilty testing revealed that EHEC strains were sensitive to broad spectrum penicillins, cephalosporins and gyrase inhibitors. [0100] a) Bacterial strains, media, culture and DNA preparation: A number of EHEC, ETEC, EPEC, EIEC, and EaggEC [0101] b) PCR-cyling: PCR recations were set up in 70 μl final volume in thin-walled 0.2 ml “optical PCR-tubes” (Perkin Elmer, Germany). The reaction mix contained: 10 μl of bacterial lysate, 5.25 μl 25 mmol MgCl2, 7 μl 10×PCR buffer, 40 pmol primers, 20 pmol specific fluorogenic probe, 150 μM of each dATP, dTTP, dGTP, dCTP (Perkin Elmer), 1 U AmpliTaq-Polymerase (Perkin Elmer). A Perkin Elmer model 9600 thermal cycler was used for PCR cycling. Initial denaturation of bacterial DNA was performed by heating for 5 min to 94° C. All cycles included a denaturation step for 15 sec at 94° C., annealing for 1 min 30 sec at 55° C., and extension for 1 min 30 sec at 65° C. 35 cycles were performed. [0102] c) Post-PCR processing: After completion of cycling, the fluorescence intensities of the reporter dye, FAM, and the quencher dye, TAMRA, were determined using a Perkin Elmer LS50B luminiscence spectrophotometer equipped with a plate reader and modified for fluorescence measurements of PCR reactions in optical tubes. ΔRQ values were calculated as described in (74). A ΔRQthreshold value was calculated on the basis of a 99% confidence interval above the mean of the triplicate no template controls (ΔRQthreshold=6.95×stdmean of no template controls). PCR reactions were scored positive if ΔRQsample>ΔRQthreshold was given. For verification of the sensitivity of TaqMan™-measurements, PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. 15 μl of sample were loaded with 2 μl sample buffer. PCR products were separated in 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide at 100V for 35 min. DNA was visualized under UV light and a digital image file was obtained using the Eagle EyeII System (Stratagene). [0103] d) Verification of PCR amplificates: PCR product obtained from templates of respective positive control strains were directly subcloned into the TA cloning vector (Invitrogen, Germany) for verification of specificity of PCR amplification. After transfection (CaCl2-method) of DH5α bacteria with the ligation products, plasmid containing bacteria were selected on ampicillin (Sigma, Germany) containing LB plates. Plasmid DNA was purified with Qiagen DNA purification columns (Quiagen, Germany). Inserts were PCR-cycle sequenced employing dideoxy-nucleotides conjugated to 4 dyes (DNA Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit, Perkin Elmer, Germany). Sequences were obtained with an Applied Biosystems model 373A (Applied Biosystems, Germany). Insert sequences were aligned to published sequences as referenced in Table 1 using the McDNAsis programme (Appligene, Great Britain). Sequence comparisons verified that the PCR products were identical to the respective virulence factors or toxins. [0104] e) Sensitivity of TaqMan™ technique: For determination of the sensitivity of the TaqMan method, serial log-step dilutions of positive control strains were performed in a solution containing 107 cfu of [0105] f) Colony hybridisation and isolation of EHEC bacteria: EHEC bacterial strains and stool samples from patients testing positive in sltI or sltII TaqMan™-PCR were subjected to colony hybridisation. Briefly, bacteria were plated on McConkey agar plates such that single colonies could be seen. Bacteria were blotted on nylon membranes (Genescreen Plus, NEN, Germany), cracked (1% SDS), denatured (0.5M NaOH, 1.5M NaCl), neutralized (1M TRIS, 1.5M NaCl), and washed (20×SSC). Membranes were baked at 80° C. for 2 hours. DNA probes specific for sltI or sltII were labelled with fluorescein (Gene-Images random prime labelling module, Amersham, Germany). Afterwards, filters were hybridized with labelled probes. Hybridization was verified by non-radioactive detection system employing anti-FITC peroxidase mAb and ECL detection module (Gene-Images CDP-Star detection module, Amersham, Germany). Bacterial colonies hybridizing with the probe and non-hybridizing colonies were picked, verified by TaqMan-PCR and tested for antibiotic susceptibility. Antibiotic susceptibility testing. EHEC and non-EHEC [0106] [0107] [0108] [0109] 1. Centers for Disease Control. 1982. Isolation of [0110] 2. Karmali, M. A., M. Petric, C. Lim, P. C. Fleming, and B. T. Steele. 1983. [0111] 3. Karmali, M. A., M. Petric, C. Lim, and P. C. Fleming. 1985. The association between idiopatic hemolitic uremic syndrom and infection by verotoxin-producing [0112] 4. Riley, L. W., R. S. Remis, S. D. Helgerson, H. B. McGee, J. G. Wells, B. R. Davis, R. J. Hebert, E. S. Olcott, L. M. Johnson, N. T. Hargrett, P. A. Blake, and M. L. Cohen. 1983. Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare [0113] 5. Pai, C. H., R. Gordon, H. V. Sims, and L. E. Bryan. 1984. Sporadic cases of hemorrhagic colitis associated with [0114] 6. Borczyk, A. A., M. A. Karmali, H. Lior, and L. M. Duncan. 1987. Bovine reservoir for verotoxin-producing [0115] 7. Blanco, J. E., M. Blanco, and J. Blanco. 1995. [Enterotoxigenic, verotoxigenic, and necrotoxigenic [0116] 8. Ostroff, S. M., P. M. Griffin, R. V. Tauxe, L. D. Shipman, K. D. Greene, J. G. Wells, J. H. Lewis, P. A. Blake, and J. M. Kobayashi. 1990. A statewide outbreak of [0117] 9. Centers for Disease Control. 1993. Update: multistate outbreak of [0118] 10. Nathan, R. 1996. Japans [0119] 11. Griffin, P. M., S. M. Ostroff, R. V. Tauxe, K. D. Greene, J. G. Wells, J. H. Lewis, and P. A. Blake. 1988. Illnesses associated with [0120] 12. Karmali, M. A. 1989. Infection by verocytotoxin-producing [0121] 13. Kovacs, M. J., J. Roddy, S. Gregoire, W. Cameron, L. Eidus, and J. Drouin. 1990. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following hemorrhagic colitis due to [0122] 14. O'Brien, A. D. and R. K. Holmes. 1987. Shiga and Shiga-like toxins. [0123] 15. Karch, H. and J. Bockemühl. 1989. [Infections by enterohemorrhagic [0124] 16. Siegler, R. L. 1995. The hemolytic uremic syndrome. [0125] 17. Rowe, P. C., W. Walop, H. Lior, and A. M. Mackenzie. 1991. Haemolytic anaemia after childhood [0126] 18. 1996. Haufung von EHEC-Erkrankungen in Bayern. [0127] 19. Doyle, M. P. 1991. [0128] 20. Belongia, E. A., K. L. MacDonald, G. L. Parham, K. E. White, J. A. Korlath, M. N. Lobato, S. M. Strand, K. A. Casale, and M. T. Osterholm. 1991. An outbreak of [0129] 21. O'Brien, A. D., A. R. Melton, C. K. Schmitt, M. L. McKee, M. L. Batts, and D. E. Griffin. 1993. Profile of [0130] 22. Beutin, L., D. Geier, H. Steinruck, S. Zimmermann, and F. Scheutz. 1993. Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing [0131] 23. Martin, M. L., L. D. Shipman, J. G. Wells, M. E. Potter, K. Hedberg, I. K. Wachsmuth, R. V. Tauxe, J. P. Davis, J. Arnoldi, and J. Tilleli. 1986. Isolation of [0132] 24. Besser, R. E., S. M. Lett, J. T. Weber, M. P. Doyle, T. J. Barrett, J. G. Wells, and P. M. Griffin. 1993. An outbreak of diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome from [0133] 25. Read, S. C., C. L. Gyles, R. C. Clarke, H. Lior, and S. McEwen. 1990. Prevalence of verocytotoxigenic [0134] 26. Gannon, V. P., R. K. King, J. Y. Kim, and E. J. Thomas. 1992. Rapid and sensitive method for detection of Shiga-like toxin-producing [0135] 27. Bopp, C. A., K. D. Greene, F. P. Downes, E. G. Sowers, J. G. Wells, and I. K. Wachsmuth. 1987. Unusual verotoxin-producing [0136] 28. Farmer, J. J. and B. R. Davis. 1985. H7 antiserum-sorbitol fermentation medium: a single tube screening medium for detecting [0137] 29. Scotland, S. M., B. Rowe, H. R. Smith, G. A. Willshaw, and R. J. Gross. 1988. Vero cytotoxin-producing strains of [0138] 30. Scotland, S. M., G. A. Willshaw, H. R. Smith, B. Said, N. Stokes, and B. Rowe. 1993. Virulence properties of [0139] 31. Russmann, H., E. Kothe, H. Schmidt, S. Franke, D. Harmsen, A. Caprioli, and H. Karch. 1995. Genotyping of Shiga-like toxin genes in non-O157 [0140] 32. Koneman, E. W., S. D. Allen, W. M. Janda, P. C. Schreckenberger, and C. W. j. Washington. 1992. The Enterobacteriaceae. In Diagnostic Microbiology. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia. 132-133. [0141] 33. Edelman, R. and N. F. Pierce. 1984. From the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Summary of the 19th United States-Japan Joint Cholera Conference. [0142] 34. Hart, C. A., R. M. Batt, and J. R. Saunders. 1993. Diarrhoea caused by [0143] 35. Chapman, P. A. and C. M. Daly. 1993. Evaluation of non-radioactive trivalent DNA probe (LT, ST1a, ST1b) for detecting enterotoxigenic [0144] 36. Moseley, S. L., J. W. Hardy, M. I. Hug, P. Echeverria, and S. Falkow. 1983. Isolation and nucleotide sequence determination of a gene encoding a heat-stable enterotoxin of [0145] 37. Jerse, A. E., J. Yu, B. D. Tall, and J. B. Kaper. 1990. A genetic locus of enteropathogenic [0146] 38. Taylor, D. N., P. Echeverria, O. Sethabutr, C. Pitarangsi, U. Leksomboon, N. R. Blacklow, B. Rowe, R. Gross, and J. Cross. 1988. Clinical and microbiologic features of Shigella and enteroinvasive [0147] 39. Prats, G. and T. Llovet. 1995. [Enteroinvasive [0148] 40. Nataro, J. P., Y. Deng, D. R. Maneval, A. L. German, W. C. Martin, and M. M. Levine. 1992. Aggregative adherence fimbriae I of enteroaggregative [0149] 41. Cohen, M. B., J. A. Hawkins, L. S. Weckbach, J. L. Staneck, M. M. Levine, and J. E. Heck. 1993. Colonization by enteroaggregative [0150] 42. Chang, P. P., J. Moss, E. M. Twiddy, and R. K. Holmes. 1987. Type II heat-labile enterotoxin of [0151] 43. Pickett, C. L., D. L. Weinstein, and R. K. Holmes. 1987. Genetics of type IIa heat-labile enterotoxin of [0152] 44. Giron, J. A., M. S. Donnenberg, W. C. Martin, K. G. Jarvis, and J. B. Kaper. 1993. Distribution of the bundle-forming pilus structural gene (bfpA) among enteropathogenic [0153] 45. Karch, H., J. Heesemann, R. Laufs, A. D. O'Brien, C. O. Tacket, and M. M. Levine. 1987. A plasmid of enterohemorrhagic [0154] 46. Nataro, J. P., M. M. Baldini, and J. B. Kaper. 1985. Detection of an Adherence Factor of Enteropathogenic [0155] 47. Watanabe, H., E. Arakawa, K. Ito, J. Kato, and A. Nakamura. 1990. Genetic analysis of an invasion region by use of a Tn3-lac transposon and identification of a second positive regulator gene, invE, for cell invasion of Shigella sonnei: significant homology of invE with ParB of plasmid P1. [0156] 48. Sasakawa, C., K. Komatsu, T. Tobe, T. Suzuki, and M. Yoshikawa. 1993. Eight genes in region 5 that form an operon are essential for invasion of epithelial cells by Shigella flexneri 2a. [0157] 49. Echeverria, P., O. Serichantalerg, S. Changchawalit, B. Baudry, M. M. Levine, F. Orskov, and I. Orskov. 1992. Tissue culture-adherent [0158] 50. Schmidt, H., C. Knop, S. Franke, S. Aleksic, J. Heesemann, and H. Karch. 1995. Development of PCR for screening of enteroaggregative [0159] 51. Faruque, S. M., K. Haider, M. M. Rahman, A. R. Abdul Alim, A. H. Baqui, Q. S. Ahmad, K. M. Hossain, and M. J. Albert. 1992. Evaluation of a DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative [0160] 52. Yamamoto, T., P. Echeverria, and T. Yokota. 1992. Drug resistance and adherence to human intestines of enteroaggregative [0161] 53. Savarino, S. J., A. Fasano, J. Watson, B. M. Martin, M. M. Levine, S. Guandalini, and P. Guerry. 1993. Enteroaggregative [0162] 54. Bennett, A. R., S. MacPhee, and R. P. Betts. 1995. Evaluation of methods for the isolation and detection of [0163] 55. March, S. B. and S. Ratnam. 1986. Sorbitol-MacConkey medium for detection of [0164] 56. Kleanthous, H., N. K. Fry, H. R. Smith, R. J. Gross, and B. Rowe. 1988. The use of sorbitol-MacConkey agar in conjunction with a specific antiserum for the detection of Vero cytotoxin-producing strains of [0165] 57. March, S. B. and S. Ratnam. 1989. Latex agglutination test for detection of [0166] 58. Beutin, L., S. Aleksic, S. Zimmermann, and K. Gleier. 1994. Virulence factors and phenotypical traits of verotoxigenic strains of [0167] 59. Stroeher, U. H., L. Bode, L. Beutin, and P. A. Manning. 1993. Characterization and sequence of a 33-kDa enterohemolysin (Ehly 1)-associated protein in [0168] 60. Johnson, R. P., R. J. Durham, S. T. Johnson, L. A. MacDonald, S. R. Jeffrey, and B. T. Butman, 1995. Detection of [0169] 61. Padhye, N. V. and M. P. Doyle. 1991. Rapid procedure for detecting enterohemorrhagic [0170] 62. Clark, C. G., S. Johnson, and R. P. Johnson. 1995. Further characterisation of a monoclonal antibody reactive with [0171] 63. Karmali, M. A., M. Petric, M. Winkler, M. Bielaszewska, J. Brunton, N. van de Kar, T. Morooka, G. B. Nair, S. E. Richardson, and G. S. Arbus. 1994. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to [0172] 64. Gunzer, F., H. Bohm, H. Russmann, M. Bitzan, S. Aleksic, and H. Karch. 1992. Molecular detection of sorbitol-fermenting [0173] 65. Bockemuhl, J., S. Aleksic, and H. Karch. 1992. Serological and biochemical properties of Shiga-like toxin (verocytotoxin)-producing strains of [0174] 66. Smith, H. R., S. M. Scotland, G. A. Willshaw, C. Wray, I. M. McLaren, T. Cheasty, and B. Rowe. 1988. Vero cytotoxin production and presence of VT genes in [0175] 67. Karch, H. and T. Meyer. 1989. Evaluation of oligonucleotide probes for identification of shiga-like-toxin-producing [0176] 68. Jackson, M. P. 1991. Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Shighella dysenteriae Type 1 and [0177] 69. Johnson, W. M., D. R. Pollard, H. Lior, S. D. Tyler, and K. R. Rozee. 1990. Differentiation of genes coding for [0178] 70. Johnson, W. M., S. D. Tyler, G. Wang, and H. Lior. 1991. Amplification by the polymerase chain reaction of a specific target sequence in the gene coding for [0179] 71. Karch, H. and T. Meyer. 1989. Single primer pair for amplifying segments of distinct shiga-like-toxin genes by polymerase chain reaction. [0180] 72. Pollard, D. and W. M. Johnson. 1990. Rapid and Specific Detection of Verotoxin Genes in [0181] 73. Holland, P. M., R. D. Abramson, R. Watson, and D. H. Gelfand. 1991. Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′- - - 3′ exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. [0182] 74. Bassler, H. A., S. J. Flood, K. J. Livak, J. Marmaro, R. Knorr, and C. A. Batt. 1995. Use of a fluorogenic probe in a PCR-based assay for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes. [0183] 75. Livak, K. J., S. J. Flood, J. Marmaro, W. Giusti, and K. Deetz. 1995. Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridization. [0184] 76. Förster, V. 1948. Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. [0185] 77. Paton, A. W., J. C. Paton, P. N. Goldwater, and P. A. Manning. 1993. Direct detection of [0186] 78. Paton, A. W., J. C. Paton, P. N. Goldwater, M. W. Heuzenroeder, and P. A. Manning. 1993. Sequence of a variant Shiga-like toxin type-I operon of [0187] 79. Paton, A. W., J. C. Paton, and P. A. Manning. 1993. Polymerase chain reaction amplification, cloning and sequencing of variant [0188] 80. Gyles, C. L., S. A. De Grandis, C. MacKenzie, and J. L. Brunton. 1988. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the genes determining verocytotoxin production in a porcine edema disease isolate of [0189] 81. Gannon, V. P., C. Teerling, S. A. Masri, and C. L. Gyles. 1990. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of another variant of the [0190] 82. Schmitt, C. K., M. L. McKee, and A. D. O'Brien. 1991. Two copies of Shiga-like toxin II-related genes common in enterohemorrhagic [0191] 83. Schmidt, H., M. Montag, J. Bockemuhl, J. Heesemann, and H. Karch. 1993. Shiga-like toxin II-related cytotoxins in [0192] 84. Inoue, T., T. Tsuji, M. Koto, S. Imamura, and A. Miyama. 1993. Amino acid sequence of heat-labile enterotoxin from chicken enterotoxigenic [0193] 85. Franke, J., H. Schmidt, and H. Karch. 1994. Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of Enteropathogenic [0194] 86. Yu, J. and J. B. Kaper. 1992. Cloning and characterization of the eae gene of enterohaemorrhagic [0195] 87. Kato, J., Y. Nishimura, R. Imamura, H. Niki, S. Hiraga, and H. Suzuki. 1990. New topoisomerase essential for chromosome segregation in [0196] 88. Zhao, S., S. E. Mitchell, J. Meng, M. P. Doyle, and S. Kresovich. 1995. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a gene upstream of the eaeA gene of enterohemorrhagic [0197] 89. Paton, A. W. and J. C. Paton. 1996. Enterobacter cloacae producing a shiga-like toxin II-related cytotoxinn associated with a case of hemolytic-uremic syndrome. [0198]90. Witham, P. K., K. J. Livak, C. A. Batt, and C. T. Yamashiro. 1996. A PCR-based assay for detection of [0199] 91. Karch, H., C. Janetzki-Mittmann, S. Aleksic, and M. Datz. 1996. Isolation of Enterohemorrhagic [0200] 92. Huppertz, H. I., D. Busch, H. Schmidt, S. Aleksic, and H. Karch. 1996. Diarrhea in young children associated with BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
LT-1: 5′ GCG TTA CTA TCC TCT CTA TGT G 3′ and LT-2: 5′ AGT TTT CCA TAC TGA TTG CCG C 3′; ST-1: 5′ TCC CTC AGG ATG CTA AAC CAG 3′ and ST-2a: 5′ TCG ATT TAT TCA ACA AAG CAA C 3′; EASTI-1: 5′ AAC TGC TGG GTA TGT GGC TGG 3′ and EASTI-2: 5′ TGC TGA CCT GCC TCT TCC ATG 3′; EA-1: 5′ CTG GCG AAA GAC TGT ATC ATT G 3′ and EA-2: 5′ TAA TGT ATA GAA ATC CGC TGT T 3′; EI-1: 5′ TTT CTG GAT GGT ATG GTG AGG 3′ and EI-2: 5′ CTT GAA CAT AAG GAA ATA AAC 3′; EP-1: 5′ CAG GGT AAA AGA AAG ATG ATA AG 3′ and EP-2: 5′ AAT ATG GGG ACC ATG TAT TAT C 3′; EPeh-1: 5′ CCC GGA CCC GGC ACA AGC ATA AG 3′ and EPeh-2: 5′ AGT CTC GCC AGT ATT CGC CAC C 3′; SltI-1: 5′ ATG AAA AAA ACA TTA TTA ATA GC 3′ and SltI-2: 5′ TCA CYG AGC TAT TCT GAG TCA AGC 3′; and SltII-1: 5′ ATG AAG AAG ATR WTT RTD GCR GYT TTA TTY G 3′ and SltII-2: 5′ TCA GTC ATW ATT AAA CTK CAC YTS RGC AAA KCC 3′ LT-1: 5′ GCG TTA CTA TCC TCT CTA TGT G 3 and LT-2: 5′ AGT TTT CCA TAC TGA TTG CCG C 3′; ST-1: 5′ TCC CTC AGG ATG CTA AAC CAG 3′ and ST-2a: 5′ TCG ATT TAT TCA ACA AAG CAA C 3′;. EASTI-1: 5′ AAC TGC TGG GTA TGT GGC TGG 3′ and EASTI-2: 5′ TGC TGA CCT GCC TCT TCC ATG 3′; EA-1: 5′ CTG GCG AAA GAC TGT ATC ATT G 3′ and EA-2: 5′ TAA TGT ATA GAA ATC CGC TGT T 3′; EI-1: 5′ TTT CTG GAT GGT ATG GTG AGG 3′ and EI-2: 5′ CTT GAA CAT AAG GAA ATA AAC 3′; EP-1: 5′ CAG GGT AAA AGA AAG ATG ATA AG 3′ and EP-2: 5′ AAT ATG GGG ACC ATG TAT TAT C 3′; EPeh-1: 5′ CCC GGA CCC GGC ACA AGC ATA AG 3′ and EPeh-2: 5′ AGT CTC GCC AGT ATT CGC CAC C 3′; SltI-1: 5′ ATG AAA AAA ACA TTA TTA ATA GC 3′ and SltI-2: 5′ TCA CYG AGC TAT TCT GAG TCA AGC 3′; SltII-1: 5′ ATG AAG AAG ATR WTT RTD GCR GYT TTA TTY G 3′ and SltII-2: 5′ TCA GTC ATW ATT AAA CTK CAC YTS RGC AAA KCC 3′ THE INVENTION
EXAMPLE
1. Prevalence of Pathogenic
2. Materials and Methods
Strain Group number Serotype Virulence factor/toxin EHEC 1193/89 O157:H- sltI, eae 3574/92 O157:H7 sltII, eae A9167C O157:H7 sltI, sltIIc, eae 5769/87 O157:H7 sltI, sltII, eae 427/89 O157:H- sltI, sltIIc, eae 1249/87 O157:H7 sltII, sltIIc, eae ETEC 147/1 O128:H- ST 164/82 O148:H28 LT EPEC 111/87 O111 EAF, eae 12810 O114:H2 EAF, eae EIEC 76-5 O143 inv-plasmid 12860 O124 inv-plasmid EaggEC pCVD432 plasmid control ATCC 11775 — Primers for detection of pathogenic A/G/T, Y is C/T and K is G/T. Size Virulence location of factor/ Sequence of PCR Gen- Group toxin Primer (5′→3′) primer product bankRef. Ref. ETEC LT LT-1 gcg tta cta tcc tct 874-895 339 S60731 (84) cta tgt g LT-2 agt ttt cca tac tga 1213-1192 ttg ccg c ST ST-1 tcc ctc agg atg cta 100-120 260 M34916 (36) aac cag ST-2a tcg att tat tca aca 360-339 aag caa c EaggEC pCVD432 EA-1 ctg gcg aaa gac 66-87 629 X81423 (40, 50) plasmid tgt atc att g EA-2 taa tgt ata gaa atc 695-674 cgc tgt t EIEC inv- EI-1 ttt ctg gat ggt atg 17786-17806 303 D50601 (38, 48) plasmid gtg agg emb EI-2 ctt gaa cat aag 18089-18069 gaa ata aac EPEC EAF EP-1 cag ggt aaa aga 546-568 398 X76137 (37, 85) plasmid aag atg ata ag EP-2 aat atg ggg acc 944-923 atg tat tat c eae EPeh-1 ccc gga ccc ggc 91-113 872 Z11541 (86) aca agc ata ag EPeh-2 agt ctc gcc agt att 963-942 cgc cac c EHEC sltI sltI-1 atg aaa aaa aca 1113-1135 287 Z36899 (77, 78) tta tta ata gc sltI-2 tca cyg agc tat tct 1400-1376 gag tca acg sltII sltII-1 atg aag aag atr 1148-1178 265 L11079 (79-83) wtt rtd gcr sltII-2 gyt tta tty g 1413-1385 tca gtc atw att aaa ctk cac yts rgc aaa kcc control parC par-1 aac ctg ttc agc gcc 141-161 260 M58408 (87) gca ttg par-2 aca acc ggg att 401-381 cgg tgt aac TaqMan ™-probes used for detection of pathogenic virulence Gen- factor/ Probe for Taqman ™ bank Group toxin (FAM-5′→3′-TAMRA) bp Ref. Ref. ETEC LT agc tcc cca gtc tat tac aga act atg 903-929 S60731 (84) ST aca tac gtt aca gac ata atc aga atc ag 334-306 M34916 (36) EaggEC pCVD432 ctc ttt taa ctt atg ata tgt aat gtc tgg 668-639 X81423 (40, 50) plasmid EIEC inv- caa aaa cag aag aac cta tgt cta cct 18063-18037 D50601 (38, 48) plasmid emb EPEC EAF- ctt gga gtg atc gaa cgg gat cca aat 575-601 X76137 (37, 85) plasmid eae taa acg ggt att atc acc aga aaa atc c 935-908 Z11541 (86) EHEC sltI tcg ctg aat ccc cct cca tta tga cag gca 1367-1338 Z36899 (77, 78) sltII cag gta ctg gat ttg att gtg aca gtc att 1371-1342 L11079 (79-83) control parC atg tct gaa ctg ggc ctg aat gcc agc 169-199 M58408 (87) gcc Frequency of pathogenic children with diarrhea (n = 100) Agar gel TaqMan: electrophores virulence number of is: number of factor/ positive positive pathogenic Group toxin isolates isolates group ETEC LT 2 2 5 ST 3 3 EaggEC 60 kb 8 8 8 plasmid EIEC inv plasmid 1 1 1 EPEC EAF plasmid 1 1 16 eae 15 15 EHEC sltI 2 2 2 sltII 1 1 control parC 100 100 REFERENCES